Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[crmsh-4.6] Fix: report: Show different perspectives of cluster status with multiple 'crm_mon' options (bsc#1204273) #1345

Conversation

liangxin1300
Copy link
Collaborator

@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 commented Mar 5, 2024

backport #1346

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.82%. Comparing base (21cbb9e) to head (fab3701).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           crmsh-4.6    #1345   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      52.82%   52.82%           
==========================================
  Files             79       79           
  Lines          24002    24002           
==========================================
  Hits           12678    12678           
  Misses         11324    11324           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 changed the base branch from master to crmsh-4.6 March 6, 2024 00:33
@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 changed the title Fix: report: Show different perspectives of cluster status with multiple 'crm_mon' options (bsc#1204273) [crmsh-4.6] Fix: report: Show different perspectives of cluster status with multiple 'crm_mon' options (bsc#1204273) Mar 6, 2024
@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2024 00:41
@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 force-pushed the 20240305_display_more_for_crm_mon branch from 2610a39 to fab3701 Compare March 6, 2024 00:45
@liangxin1300 liangxin1300 merged commit 4cdf996 into ClusterLabs:crmsh-4.6 Mar 12, 2024
31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants